<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing of fear</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthcarewordsmith.com/marketing/marketing-of-fear/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthcarewordsmith.com/marketing/marketing-of-fear/</link>
	<description>Copywriting and Marketing Musings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ina</title>
		<link>http://healthcarewordsmith.com/marketing/marketing-of-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcarewordsmith.com/?p=273#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Thanks Wade.

While Direct Marketers may not like the option, opting out of unsolicited mailings may be an option.  And one you might consider in the future for your mother&#039;s safety.  Of course if you are getting ideas for marketing through them, that&#039;s a reason to keep them coming.

I believe we&#039;re now seeing some of the consequences of the marketing of fear.  The stock market doesn&#039;t seem to like it, nor does the economy. I heard yesterday an analyst say he thinks people are afraid to spend money.  Afraid their jobs will be gone tomorrow or things will get significantly worse before they get better.  

Or, maybe it&#039;s the overwhelming feeling of dealing with numbers in the trillions for deficit spending.  And the fear that things are spiraling out of control.

And that to me is a real risk marketers take with marketing fear.  You never know how&lt;code&gt;&#8212;&lt;/code&gt;or when&lt;code&gt;&#8212;&lt;/code&gt;fear will turn on and attack the marketer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Wade.</p>
<p>While Direct Marketers may not like the option, opting out of unsolicited mailings may be an option.  And one you might consider in the future for your mother&#8217;s safety.  Of course if you are getting ideas for marketing through them, that&#8217;s a reason to keep them coming.</p>
<p>I believe we&#8217;re now seeing some of the consequences of the marketing of fear.  The stock market doesn&#8217;t seem to like it, nor does the economy. I heard yesterday an analyst say he thinks people are afraid to spend money.  Afraid their jobs will be gone tomorrow or things will get significantly worse before they get better.  </p>
<p>Or, maybe it&#8217;s the overwhelming feeling of dealing with numbers in the trillions for deficit spending.  And the fear that things are spiraling out of control.</p>
<p>And that to me is a real risk marketers take with marketing fear.  You never know how<code>&mdash;</code>or when<code>&mdash;</code>fear will turn on and attack the marketer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade</title>
		<link>http://healthcarewordsmith.com/marketing/marketing-of-fear/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthcarewordsmith.com/?p=273#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Agree completely, Ina.

You really see it in the fundraiser&#039;s email.

Our household gets inundated by junk mail from politicos and other fundraisers.  (My mother, alas, thinks the phony petitions are real effort to gather public opinion, and so responds to most of them. And so of course, on the theory that a positive responder of any kind is a more likely contributor later, she gets added to mail-more-often lists.)

And it&#039;s like the only button the politicos know to push is the fear button.   I&#039;m a fan of direct mail as a marketing tool -- as you know, my original business model was going to emphasize writing DM copy -- but this stuff bothers the heck out of me.

It doesn&#039;t surprise me, of course.  For-profit-companies using direct mail have to operate under two constraints:  occasional regulatory intervention that makes opting out easier, and, more importantly, the market constraint that says &quot;if people don&#039;t buy, the direct mail budget doesn&#039;t have funds.&quot;  

The politicos, of course, don&#039;t have either.  They write themselves an exception to the opt-out regulation (under a &quot;protecting democracy&quot; fiction), and being funded in large part via non-market methods (e.g. fed election funds), they don&#039;t have to worry about the market.  

And so we get, I kid you not, dozens of pieces per week.  Often in unique packaging (more likely to open) like boxes, mailing tubes, and, my favorite, clear envelopes with a crisp new dollar bill visible inside.  Indeed, our mail inflow is good for about one mailing cent by _certified mail_ a week.  This to a woman who, to my knowledge, has never written a contribution to any of them of so much as $50-100.  

Though she does write a a number of $5-20 checks, alas.  And so the inefficiency and obscenity of fearmongering continues.

No, obscene is too mild a term.

This isn&#039;t like pornography.  It&#039;s worse.

Pornography may screw its users and producers and their families.  Fearmongering screws us all.

Wade</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree completely, Ina.</p>
<p>You really see it in the fundraiser&#8217;s email.</p>
<p>Our household gets inundated by junk mail from politicos and other fundraisers.  (My mother, alas, thinks the phony petitions are real effort to gather public opinion, and so responds to most of them. And so of course, on the theory that a positive responder of any kind is a more likely contributor later, she gets added to mail-more-often lists.)</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s like the only button the politicos know to push is the fear button.   I&#8217;m a fan of direct mail as a marketing tool &#8212; as you know, my original business model was going to emphasize writing DM copy &#8212; but this stuff bothers the heck out of me.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t surprise me, of course.  For-profit-companies using direct mail have to operate under two constraints:  occasional regulatory intervention that makes opting out easier, and, more importantly, the market constraint that says &#8220;if people don&#8217;t buy, the direct mail budget doesn&#8217;t have funds.&#8221;  </p>
<p>The politicos, of course, don&#8217;t have either.  They write themselves an exception to the opt-out regulation (under a &#8220;protecting democracy&#8221; fiction), and being funded in large part via non-market methods (e.g. fed election funds), they don&#8217;t have to worry about the market.  </p>
<p>And so we get, I kid you not, dozens of pieces per week.  Often in unique packaging (more likely to open) like boxes, mailing tubes, and, my favorite, clear envelopes with a crisp new dollar bill visible inside.  Indeed, our mail inflow is good for about one mailing cent by _certified mail_ a week.  This to a woman who, to my knowledge, has never written a contribution to any of them of so much as $50-100.  </p>
<p>Though she does write a a number of $5-20 checks, alas.  And so the inefficiency and obscenity of fearmongering continues.</p>
<p>No, obscene is too mild a term.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t like pornography.  It&#8217;s worse.</p>
<p>Pornography may screw its users and producers and their families.  Fearmongering screws us all.</p>
<p>Wade</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
